Key Highlights
Motadata ServiceOps scores each managed Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoint against its missing patches, highlights the most exposed machines first, and turns that posture into audit-ready reporting an auditor will accept.
Each managed computer is scored against the patches it's missing. Machines are flagged "Highly Vulnerable" or "Vulnerable," so the riskiest show up on their own, with no manual triage.
Scores Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints from one console.
Highlights the most exposed machines automatically, not a flat list to read.
Updates as discovery refreshes each machine's missing-patch picture.
Thresholds are set per severity: Critical, Important, Moderate, Low. A strict priority hierarchy resolves them, so the most dangerous gap always defines a machine's status.
Severity comes from each vendor's own advisory, with no guesswork and no invented scoring.
Critical outranks Important, then Moderate, then Low when a machine matches more than one label.
Per-severity thresholds tune how aggressively each status is assigned.
Beyond vendor severity, a synced CVE vulnerability repository ranks risk by severity, exploitability, and exposure. Remediation targets the vulnerabilities under real risk first.
A centralized vulnerability repository syncs known CVEs from external feeds.
Per-category access scoping by Company and Group, not by role.
Prioritization is rule-based, not AI-driven, surfacing the highest-risk exposures for action.
Audit reports give administrators and security engineers continuous visibility. They cover deployment history, missing-patch coverage, and compliance status throughout the environment.
Audit scope definition and scheduled report generation.
Read deployment history and missing-patch coverage side by side.
Report export to demonstrate posture against internal and regulatory requirements.
The same patches scored and prioritized are deployed under testing and approval controls. Remediation is as defensible as the reporting.
Each patch passes through approval controls before it reaches an endpoint.
Pre-Approved, Manually Approve, or Test-and-Approve options to match the change discipline.
Definition Updates patches stay pre-approved by default, keeping security-definition coverage current.
Patch data and package export from a connected system into isolated, air-gapped networks.
Configurable deployment notification frequency, including end-user install and reboot notices.
Intelligence
A team can run patches weekly and still be exposed. A flat list of missing patches treats a Critical kernel gap on a production server the same as a Low cosmetic update on a spare laptop, spreading effort evenly instead of aimed at risk. A deployment log alone can't tell an auditor which machines were most vulnerable or what was done about them.
Motadata ServiceOps reframes the problem around exposure, not activity. System Health Settings score each machine by its missing patches and flag dangerous ones. Patch Audit captures the posture and remediation history behind them. Together they let teams see exposure continuously, work the riskiest endpoints first, and walk into a review with the evidence already assembled, covering Windows, macOS, and Linux, on ServiceOps SaaS or on-premise.
How It Works
Set thresholds:Define missing-patch thresholds for Critical, Important, Moderate, and Low severity labels.
Score endpoints:Compare missing-patch counts against severity thresholds on Windows, macOS, and Linux nodes.
Evaluate machines matching multiple labels using fixed priority: Critical first, then High.
Deploy patches via Pre-Approved, Manually Approve, or Test-and-Approve governance modes.
Track compliance posture, deployment history, and missing-patch reports through Patch Audit.
Schedule and export audit reports to prove patch compliance for internal and regulatory reviews.
Role-Based Value
Posture is defensible: an auditor sees not only that patching happens, but which machines were exposed and how that exposure was resolved.
Posture is defensible: an auditor sees not only that patching happens, but which machines were exposed and how that exposure was resolved.
Effort points at the endpoints that matter first, through severity thresholds and a Critical-first hierarchy rather than manual triage.
Effort points at the endpoints that matter first, through severity thresholds and a Critical-first hierarchy rather than manual triage.
A synced CVE repository ranks risk by severity, exploitability, and exposure, so remediation targets the vulnerabilities under real risk.
A synced CVE repository ranks risk by severity, exploitability, and exposure, so remediation targets the vulnerabilities under real risk.
All managed Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints are scored against their missing patches, so the riskiest machines show up on their own.
All managed Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints are scored against their missing patches, so the riskiest machines show up on their own.
From Visibility to Control
Continuous compliance visibility. A live read on which machines are vulnerable and which are covered, spanning Windows, macOS, and Linux. Not a quarterly snapshot.
Risk-first remediation. Vendor-severity thresholds and the Critical-first hierarchy point effort at the endpoints that matter before the ones that don't.
Trusted delivery. Patch testing plus the approval mode that matches the change discipline. Remediation is controlled, not improvised.
Audit-ready reporting. Scoped, scheduled Patch Audit reports that document deployment history and compliance status, no manual scramble required.
Defensible posture. Show an auditor that patching happens, which machines were exposed, and how that exposure was resolved.